Have accountancy valuations hit their peak?

posted in: News 0

With M&A still booming, the accountancy market is questioning whether this is as good as it gets.

“We were looking to sell in three to five years, but was the opportunity still going to be there? We decided that this is probably the peak of the market. If anything, it’s going to slow down…”

That was the view of a managing partner at a mid-tier firm I spoke to recently. They asked to remain anonymous because the deal is not yet public, but the sentiment remains. In the end, they rolled the dice, concluded valuations were unlikely to beat last year’s highs, and took the offer. They are far from alone in mulling over this decision.

Most managing partners have had that call from a private equity house. The ones I’ve spoken to certainly have — in some cases, it’s a weekly occurrence. And there are only so many times you can bat away an approach before you start to wonder whether this really is the peak.

So will those that took the plunge regret their decision as valuations continue to rise, or are things going to slow down from here?

How long will peak valuations last?

If you listen to James Gosling, the managing director at AJ Chambers, there is no time like the present to shake hands on a deal. “Valuations definitely peaked last year,” said Gosling, who noted that 2025 had the most transactions in the accountancy space for some years.

“It had been building, but last year was really the point where many of the dynamics driving the M&A activity were really emphasised,” he said.

To say practices have had their hands full would be putting it mildly. The pressures behind the decision to sell range from the lack of a succession plan and difficulties attracting and retaining talent to regulatory burdens and the growing challenge of keeping pace with technology – a problem that has only intensified for some with the sudden rise of artificial intelligence.

These challenges are as common in an accountancy office as Teams calls, naff self-help leadership books or bitter coffee. The only difference this time is the tidal wave of private equity investment sloshing onto accountancy’s shores. The first big player in the accountancy space, really, was Cogital-backed Baldwins (now known as Azets) almost a decade ago. Since then, the likes of Xeinadin, Sumer, Cooper Parry, Gravita and even Grant Thornton have deepened their pockets with PE-investment.

Gosling also attributed last year’s heightened activity to a sense of herd mentality. “A lot of people, maybe on the fence about whether they should sell or not, were seeing their competitors or people around them being bought or merging with another independent firm,” said Gosling. “The momentum had been building, and last year we saw people say, now’s the time to move.”

The question is how long that peak will sustain. Another managing partner I spoke to this week said the peak could last anywhere from one year to five years. Regardless, after a busy 2025, the momentum is expected to continue this year anyway.

“It’s going to be relatively high because there are a lot of ongoing conversations that have dragged from 2025 into 2026,” said Gosling.

The MTD elephant in the room

Private equity-backed investment may have attracted the most headlines as the shiny new toy in the market, with huge names merging and new players surging up the accounting league table, but a lot of movement this year is expected in the independent space – especially with firms under the £1m mark.

Much of that can be attributed to the starting pistol firing on the government’s long-gestated Making Tax Digital project. Sole practitioners have done a lot of soul searching since MTD was first announced. As the April start date for the first tranche of taxpayers draws closer, sole practitioners are looking to make MTD someone else’s problem. For independent firms, this creates an opportunity.

“This market is going to come alive this year,” said Gosling. “We’re going to see a lot of solid independent firms start acquiring sole practitioners and local firms that they’ve not had conversations with before.”

In fact, these conversations are already happening. At the start of last year, Mazuma was one of the most high-profile firms to see this as a massive growth opportunity. “Lots of these firms have had their exit denied to them… ” Lucy Cohen, the founder of Mazuma, told me last year, acknowledging that the £200k to £700k firms might not be massive but they have a “solid and sticky client base”.

Fresh off securing private equity investment from Nordic-based VIEW, Cottons is another mid-tier firm that is spearheading an M&A strategy built around acquiring small and sole practitioners.

“We are keen to grow, build, and find those smaller firms who we can really empathise with, who have the same type of clients that we work with, and we can help build and then retire when they want to,” Will Smart, the managing partner at Cottons, told me this week. Smart was keen to point out that he’s been a sole practitioner two times before. “I understand what keeps them up at night.”

You can see why valuations might be peaking for this cohort as finally MTD takes centre stage. As MTD lowers the income threshold to £20,000 from 2028, the window of opportunity to sell is now.

However, attention could be turning elsewhere. Naturally, this will impact the multiples.

Big year for large firms

The question in the year ahead is at which point will the lion’s share of private equity-backed firms move their focus and attention away from the smaller sub-£4m firms and start turning their attention to the other consolidators and larger players in the market? That’s the next battlefield.

“I have no doubt there will be a consolidator acquiring other consolidators in the market,” predicted Gosling. This moment will come to a head as some private equity firms reach the point of being flipped and start looking for either another private equity sponsor or a sale to another firm.”

Gosling is aware of a couple of conversations that are already happening on this front.

“Whether or not the deals would actually happen this year or not, that’s another matter, especially since we’re talking about large firms here,” he said. “It might take a little longer, but I certainly feel there might be one this year.”

We’ll have to wait and see. Perhaps they may go another cycle before being acquired by a consolidator. They may even roll the dice on the valuations seeing as big US private equity firms have landed on these shores and are engaged in active conversations with the consolidators. Let’s not forget, US-based Lee Equity announced a majority investment in Cooper Parry in December 2024.

Peak in valuations

In short, a lot is happening in M&A. But let’s talk about the numbers. Will this activity push the valuations any higher?

“I can’t see valuations for sub-£1m and up to £8m firms moving too much [higher],” said Gosling. “We’ve had the first couple of flips now and the multiples are up around the 14x to 15x mark for private equity.

“I think those [multiples] are going to stay around for the course of the year. It will be interesting to see when the focus from the private equity firms move further up the chain and if that will naturally mean the peak we’re seeing and the supply and demand at the smaller end of the market – the £1m – £6m firms as well as sub-£1m firms – will mean valuations will start to come down,” explained Gosling.

It’s eye opening seeing how high valuations have scaled. “It was only two to three years ago that a £2m – £3m firm was getting around 5x EBITDA mark – now firms are looking at multiples much higher than that,” said Gosling.

The shift in strategy for private equity firms and the focus on the higher echelons of the market will influence those multiples for the smaller end. “As a result, we may well start to see multiples reducing or settling down,” Gosling concluded.

Roll the dice or not

The figures speak for themselves. When presented with valuations like that, it’s no wonder firms like the anonymous partner decided to roll the dice.

Every senior leader I speak with keeps a close eye on the market. They’re aware of the numbers. An offer will come that’s irresistible to the partners and they’ll go with their gut.

But sometimes it isn’t the money that seals the deal. The model being offered can matter just as much, and no two are ever quite the same.

“A good number run a typical model, but there are always nuances,” said Gosling. “A structure could be 100% buyout, but you could have people who are selling but are remaining in the business for the mid to long term. They could roll their equity into group level, which is a standard buy and build structure that a lot of private equity houses have.

“Within that are other considerations, like how they engage with clients, how they engage with staffing and whether there are growth shares for the younger team that want to get into leadership or ownership.”

Alternatively, there is the shared equity model that the likes of TC Group and ETL offer.

Then there are the unknowns. US capital is still flowing in. My inbox is still filling up with deal announcements. And almost every firm I speak to has ambitious growth plans for the next three years, with some, like AAB, even talking about quadrupling in size by 2030 – and it can’t do that without an insatiable M&A strategy.

And who can really predict what happens next in the profession? As my colleague Tom Herbert discussed on our podcast this week, the last big M&A wave was driven by the emergence of cloud accounting when firms decided they could stitch together multiple offices, even global offices, around a cloud platform. This time, the new catalyst is artificial intelligence.

Particularly in the States, roll-ups are buying traditional firms in the hope that AI will paper over the cracks and make these sprawling businesses run more efficiently. And in the accounting world, we’re always one compliance shock away from more upheaval.

But with the need to buy out retiring partners, an M&A strategy and staying ahead of the curve with tech investments, some firms don’t have the luxury to wait and see. And with valuations as high as they are, firms are going to grasp the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity while it’s there.

Article appeared in AccountingWEB by Richard Hattersley

Bridgepoint in exclusive talks to buy majority stake in Interpath

posted in: News 0

Financial advisory firm Interpath said on Monday that Bridgepoint Group plc has entered into exclusive negotiations to buy a majority stake in the business.

Terms were not disclosed, but according to reports, the deal values Interpath at about £800m.

Interpath said the potential transaction would mark “a successful exit for HIG Capital, which has supported the business since its carve-out from KPMG UK in 2021”.

Interpath employs more than 1,000 professionals globally across 12 countries including the UK, Ireland, France, Germany, Spain, the Caribbean and Hong Kong.

The financial advisory said that with Bridgepoint’s support, it will focus on accelerating its international expansion, “continuing to attract and retain top talent, broadening its service offering across existing and new geographies, and selectively pursuing strategic acquisitions to further strengthen its platform”.

Chief executive Mark Raddan said: “Today marks an exciting new chapter for Interpath as we embark on a new partnership with Bridgepoint. Not only does the team believe in our ambition, but they also share the values and culture that define who we are.

“Their investment will empower us to continue attracting exceptional talent and accelerate our expansion into new geographies across Europe, the Americas, and Asia. We are confident that with their support, we can build on our achievements, create even greater opportunities for our people, and deliver enhanced value to our clients.”

Charles Welham, partner and sector head for business & financial services at Bridgepoint, said: “Interpath is a high-quality, differentiated advisory platform with a unique culture, operating in a growing market with significant opportunity for further share gains.

“What excites us most is the opportunity to support its exceptional base of talent and, by enhancing its distinctive people proposition, accelerate the pace at which more leading professionals in their fields join the Interpath platform.

“We are thrilled to partner with Interpath’s outstanding leadership team as they enter their next phase of growth – building a more international and diversified business, and continuing to win share from more constrained and conflicted competitors.”

Article from Accountancy Age

New Charities SORP does not address fundamental accounting issues, experts say

posted in: News 0

The new Charities State of Recommended Practice (SORP) fails to address the “fundamental issues” facing charity accounting, charity experts have said. 

Yesterday, Civil Society Media hosted a webinar on the new Charities SORP, which will apply to reporting periods starting on or after 1 January 2026. 

Richard Bray, chair of the Charity Tax Group, told attendees that there has been “a lot of tidying up” to try to make the new SORP clearer, including its section on the natural classification of costs.

However, he said: “All of those things, commendable as they are, are most probably marginal increases on a journey of always trying to improve the content of the Charities SORP.

“My concern is that maybe some of the fundamental issues that face charity accounting at the moment haven’t been addressed, and they’ll have to be addressed at some stage.

“That includes the complexities that come from the new lease accounting and from having to follow the new requirements about income recognition.”

Concerns over document length

Bray, who is also finance, regulatory and taxes manager at Cancer Research UK, pointed out that the new SORP is over 300 pages, up from around 200 in the previous version.

He said: “If this is a direction of travel, we’re in serious problems. It’s time to fundamentally look at some of the issues that form the envelope for the Charities SORP.”

Also speaking at the event, Fiona Condron, national head of charities at accountancy and business advisory company BDO, said her firm had found about 5,300 changes between the new SORP’s initial exposure draft and final version.

“Now, that’s everything from a full stop and comma to changes in wording,” Condron told attendees. 

“But it gives me some confidence that the SORP-making body did take that feedback process seriously within the time frame they had to try and resolve some ambiguities and difficulties that we saw in the language of the exposure draft.”

Condron added, however, that the SORP-making body “could have gone further on things like legacy accounting to try and work out where the differences in accounting recognition could be harmonised”. 

“There are some slight ambiguities there that charities are going to have to navigate around the types of investments that they’ve got, whether they’re more on the charitable side, programme-related or on the mixed motive side,” she said. 

“We now have a very long document which in itself doesn’t give you all the answers. 

“There are lots and lots of references to ‘please go back to FRS 102’ in addition to your 300 pages. You need to sit with the similarly sized FRS 102 document to navigate some of these changes.”

Lack of compliance could undermine ‘trust in sector’

The panellists were asked how the UK charity regulators would ensure that charities comply with the SORP. 

Bray said the Charity Commission, Scottish Charity Regulator OSCR and Charity Commission for Northern Ireland “don’t necessarily have the resources to look at accounts in the way that ideally they should”. 

“It’ll be interesting to see what happens because some of the new requirements in regards to lease and income recognition are very complex, and I can imagine that there’ll be charities that’ll hardly realise that there’s been a change, and will be fundamentally incorrect in what they file with the commission,” he said.

“The concern is that very often, those accounts won’t get picked up.” 

Bray said that while many charities are committed to best practice and want to get it right, others “might simply ignore what’s required, and there won’t be the sanctions that there should be”. 

“That’s an area which will be important because it also undermines our credibility as a sector if we’re not producing information that we should.”

Condron highlighted the differences between Companies House using AI to check the compliance of company accounts and the Charity Commission, which she said were “worlds apart”. 

“We’d definitely encourage more resources from the Charity Commission to vet effectively the quality of accounts and professional advisors that have signed opinions on those accounts if issues are beginning to emerge,” she said.

“I completely agree that it’ll undermine transparency and trust in the wider sector if people don’t embrace this and get it right.”

Article appeared in Civil Society 26th November

Quarter of Gen Z staff left financial services in last year, KPMG finds

posted in: News 0

Almost a third (31%) of respondents said retaining younger talent had become harder than five years ago

Around one in four Gen Z employees have left financial services firms in the past year, with almost half of financial services leaders reporting an increase in these employees leaving their organisations, according to KPMG’s latest UK Financial Services Sentiment Survey.

The poll of more than 150 senior figures across the sector found that 49% had seen higher turnover among workers under 30 in the past 12 months. The problem was most pronounced in banking, where 54% of leaders said departures among younger staff had risen.

Almost a third (31%) of financial service leaders said retaining younger talent had become harder than five years ago, signalling concerns about the industry’s future skills pipeline.

Leaders identified several factors behind the trend, including a preference among younger workers for start-up environments (42%), better opportunities in other industries (36%), and a desire for self-employment (35%). Other reasons cited included the cost of living or relocation pressures (34%), the wish for greater flexibility (34%), and mental health and wellbeing considerations (24%).

Almost all respondents (96%) said their firms were taking steps to improve retention. Common measures included flexible working policies such as term-time contracts or staggered hours (52%), improved feedback and engagement initiatives (49%), enhanced wellbeing support (47%), and mentorship programmes (47%).

Firms were also expanding early career training (46%) and introducing purpose-driven or environmental, social and governance (ESG) projects (38%). A third said they were revising office attendance policies.

Karim Haji, global and UK head of financial services at KPMG, said: “The fact that almost half of FS leaders are seeing more young talent walk away from the sector presents a real competitive challenge for financial services. The sector needs young talent to bring diversity of skills, experience and thinking. Gen Z employees are clearly signalling a desire for more autonomy, variety and entrepreneurial experiences.”

He added: “While financial services firms are investing in retention strategies, our data shows a disconnect between what Gen Z wants – an entrepreneurial environment – and where firms’ efforts are focused – flexible working and wellbeing.

“Office presenteeism gets a lot of airtime, but most FS firms have already made strides in offering flexibility that goes far beyond remote working. Alongside that, they must keep pace with the changing values and expectations of young talent.”

Writes Accountancy Today

1 2 3 4 23