Financial services M&A activity rose 26% in 2024

posted in: News 0

Alongside this, the total disclosed deal value also rose from £12.5bn in 2023 to £20.2bn in 2024

M&A activity in the UK’s financial services industry picked up in 2024, with a 26% year-on-year increase in the number of deals, according to data from EY.

UK banks, insurers and asset managers publicly disclosed 380 M&A deals in 2024.

This was the highest annual volume since 2012 compared to 272 deals in 2023.

Alongside this, the total disclosed deal value also rose from £12.5bn in 2023 to £20.2bn in 2024.

The number of UK wealth and asset management deals increased from 107 in 2023 to 122 in 2024, with total publicly disclosed deal value rising from £2.1bn in 2023 to £9.3bn in 2024.

The number of non-UK firms acquiring UK targets rose from 54 in 2023 to 74 in 2024, however the total disclosed value decreased from £6.7bn in 2023 to £3.9bn in 2024.

As for UK firms acquiring overseas targets, this rose from 65 deals in 2023 to 97 deals in 2024, with an overall deal value remaining the flat at £1.7bn.

Damian Hourquebie, UK financial services strategy and transactions leader at EY, said: “UK financial services M&A activity reached its highest annual volume in more than a decade in 2024, as material signs of economic recovery lifted market confidence, valuations rose, and inbound deals increased.

“While there are real signs for optimism, a sense of macroeconomic uncertainty and geopolitical tensions further abroad could create headwinds as we look to the year ahead. However, if the UK’s economic outlook continues to gradually improve as expected, we anticipate the focus on M&A activity will continue throughout 2025 as confidence grows and firms accelerate plans to transform.”Today1 week ago

Writes Accountancy Today

FRC to rein in costs and move to Canary Wharf

posted in: News 0

The Financial Reporting Council plans no additional staff hires in the next 12 months as it reins in costs after double hit from ‘unexpectedly high’ public sector pay rises and next year’s national insurance hike

In a change of direction and in line with successive governments’ desires to move the regulator out of London and reduce its London-centric focus, the FRC will build up its dual-centre operation with an expansion of the new Birmingham office, adding that it would ‘skew’ its recruitment policy towards hires outside of London.

The regulator plans to move offices when the 10-year lease on its space in London Wall in the City of London expires next year, relocating to Harbour Exchange in Canary Wharf. The last time the FRC relocated in 2014 the move cost £500,000 due to capital costs and fitting out the space.

The annual budget for 2025-26 will be £74m, up 3.5% from £71.5m year on year, including running costs for the UK Endorsement Board (UKEB).

Headcount will be cut to 486, marking a 3% reduction in staff numbers, while FRC noted that it was affected by ‘an unexpectedly high public sector pay settlement’ which hiked pay increases this year.

In addition, the FRC said its budget had been ‘impacted by the change to employer’s NICs from April 2025, so to keep our overall 2025-26 budget increase as close to inflation as possible we have also sought savings in non-staff costs’.

The FRC has allocated £3m in the budget for 2025-26 to cover the higher staff costs.

The 2025-26 financial year will see a 9% increase in fees for levy payers in 2025-26, according to the FRC’s draft annual plan and budget, which has been issued for consultation with stakeholders.

Despite the above inflation levy increase, the FRC stated: ‘The FRC remains mindful of the current economic environment and is committed to avoiding unnecessary cost increases for levy payers’, adding that the rise in the levy reflects the ‘costs of core regulatory functions, in particular our corporate reporting review programme’.

For listed entities, the levies are calculated based on their market capitalisation at the end of September 2024, while latest turnover figure is used for other entities.

In terms of priorities for the next three years, the FRC said transition to a new, powerful regulator with statutory powers as the Audit, Governance and Reporting Authority (ARGA) would be pivotal. It also stressed that it would be pursuing an ‘evolved approach to supervision of audit firms and a review of enforcement procedures’.

‘To be effective we need a modernised set of statutory authorities and powers. John Kingman’s 2018 review shone a light on the serious gaps within our current authorities and remit,’ the FRC stated.

‘We welcome the government’s commitment in the July 2024 King’s Speech and we will work with DBT as they bring forward draft legislation for pre-legislative scrutiny. Our strategy has been developed to remain relevant regardless of the timing of legislation.’

The government is expected to release final plans for sweeping audit reform by the end of March 2025, but recently confirmed that ARGA will not be in place until 2028 at the earliest.

A key priority will be improving the quality of audit outside Big Four and Tier 1 firms, with an emphasis on closing the gap between the largest audit firms and the challengers ranked as Tier 2 and 3 firms, which has widened, not narrowed, in recent years. But the FRC warned that ‘the largest firms, which have in recent years enhanced their audit quality, cannot rest on their laurels’.

It will also keep close watch of the growing prevalence of private equity investment in the accountancy sector and how this affects quality and resilience of firms, and whether this is affecting the overall quality of audit. Despite this consolidation driven by private equity, the FRC warned that audit competition was limited and it will be monitoring this closely, adding: ‘Even the largest [firms] continue to face challenges competing head on with the Big Four owing to their scale, deeper pools of expertise and access to investment’.

Going forward, there will also be a focus on technology to improve productivity and effectiveness, with investment earmarked for artificial intelligence (AI) and technology, and expansion of the Sandbox initiative to develop innovative approaches to audit work.

‘We want a step change in this period in how we use and exploit technology, data and information management within our organisation,’ according to the FRC strategy plan.

The head of the FRC, Richard Moriarty said: ‘Since taking on the role of CEO a little over a year ago, I have focused on ensuring the FRC is restless at seeking to improve the way it delivers its public interest purpose and supports UK economic growth and investment. Our draft three-year strategy and draft plan and budget for 2025/26 embody this approach.

‘The strategy includes the FRC’s continued commitment to uphold high standards of corporate governance, corporate reporting, audit, and actuarial work to ensure trust and confidence in businesses across the UK.

‘This in turn enables them to attract investment and grow as well as maintain broader stakeholder support. 

‘The strategy also includes important commitments to review our regulation to ensure it is effective, proportionate and best designed for the future.’

Sara White Business and Accountancy Daily

Why talent retention tops the agenda for UK accountancy firms

posted in: News 0

Discover why talent retention is the top challenge for UK accountancy firms and how they’re adapting to thrive in 2025 and beyond

The biggest challenge facing UK accountancy firms isn’t macroeconomic uncertainty or regulatory compliance—it’s people.

A striking 67% of firms rank talent acquisition and retention as their top priority, according to the newly released 2024 UK Accountancy Sector Outlook Report, a collaboration between Accountancy Age and HSBC UK.

It is not secret the accountancy sector faces an intense battle for talent. As firms expand into new service lines like digital transformation and ESG advisory, the need for a dynamic workforce capable of adapting to changing client demands has never been greater. Yet, many firms are struggling to meet this challenge.

Small firms, for example, are leaning heavily on flexible working arrangements and remote options, with 77.8% and 73% respectively offering these benefits to attract top-tier candidates. Medium firms, on the other hand, prioritize career development programs, with 91.7% investing in initiatives to foster long-term employee loyalty. Large firms, equipped with greater financial resources, are deploying performance-based incentives such as bonuses and salary sacrifice schemes to maintain their competitive edge.

“The profession is at an inflection point,” notes Subarna Banerjee, UK Managing Partner at UHY. “To thrive, firms must align their values with those of their employees, fostering an environment where people feel valued and supported.”

The Costs of Attrition

Losing talent is both a reputational risk and a financial one. High employee turnover can lead to operational disruptions, decreased morale, and rising recruitment costs. According to the report, medium firms are particularly vulnerable, with 82.4% citing talent acquisition as a pressing issue. Their dual focus on scaling operations and maintaining workforce stability highlights the delicate balancing act many firms face.

Large firms, while seemingly better positioned, are not immune. Even with robust financial packages, 58.3% of large firms still identify talent retention as a challenge, compounded by increasing client pressures on pricing and expectations for innovative solutions.

Creative Solutions for a Competitive Market

To address these challenges, many firms are rethinking their approach to employee engagement and workforce development. Strategies include:

  • Flexible Working Models: Small firms are leveraging flexibility as a differentiator, offering hybrid and remote options to attract younger, tech-savvy talent.
  • Investment in Learning and Development: Medium firms are leading the charge in career development, recognizing that opportunities for growth are pivotal for employee satisfaction.
  • Competitive Compensation Packages: Large firms are doubling down on financial incentives, aligning rewards with performance metrics to drive loyalty.

Moreover, firms across the spectrum are experimenting with initiatives like mentorship programs, wellness offerings, and diversity and inclusion efforts to create more holistic workplace environments.

Broader Challenges Facing the Sector

While talent retention is a top concern, the report highlights several other pressing issues shaping the industry:

  • Technology Adoption: Over 75% of firms report year-on-year increases in technology spending, with many focusing on AI and automation to enhance efficiency and client services. However, 15% admit to struggling with adapting to technological advancements.
  • ESG Objectives: Firms are increasingly prioritizing sustainability, with large firms leading the way in integrating environmental, social, and governance practices into their strategies.
  • Macroeconomic Uncertainty: Rising inflation and interest rates continue to influence client pricing pressures and demand for advisory services, particularly in restructuring and insolvency.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Small and medium firms cite regulatory changes as a significant challenge, with many needing to allocate more resources to meet evolving compliance standards.

These interconnected challenges underscore the complexity of the current landscape and the need for firms to adopt multifaceted strategies to remain competitive.

The report’s findings highlight that the firms that invest in their people today will be the ones that succeed tomorrow. As the sector grapples with technological advancements, evolving client needs, and economic pressures, a resilient and motivated workforce will remain the cornerstone of success

Writes Accountancy Age

Record number of US firms retract financial results over accounting errors

posted in: News 0

The number of companies who had to withdraw financial results of companies is up from 122 in the same period last year and more than double the figure four years ago

The number of US companies that withdrew financial statements due to accounting errors has surged to a nine-year high as 140 companies had to reissue accounts in the first 10 months of the year, the FT has revealed.

According to data from Ideagen Audit Analytics, the number of companies who had to withdraw financial results of companies is up from 122 in the same period last year and more than double the figure four years ago. 

A number of “high-profile” companies were among those who admitted to doing so, including retailer Macy’s, the agricultural commodities merchant Archer Daniels Midland, and Symbiotic, a warehouse software group backed by SoftBank and Walmart. 

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) reported an increase in deficiencies in its post-pandemic inspections of audit work and has imposed stricter penalties for the most serious violations of audit standards. 

PCAOB said to the FT: “Our most recent inspections have seen significant improvement in the aggregate deficiency rates at the largest firms, which we expect to see reflected when the results are finalised next year.”

Writes Accountancy Today

1 2 3 4 5 6 21