Smaller accounting firms urge the Big 4 to share their expertise……

posted in: News 0

Audit Partners, which together earn the vast majority of FTSE 350 audit fees, said they were concerned they could be accused of breaking competition law if they helped.

Smaller Accountancy Firms have called on Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC to share their audit expertise and technology, according to reports from The Financial Times

However, the FT said that partners which together earn 98% of FTSE 350 audit fees, said they were concerned they could be accused of breaking competition law if they helped. Delivering training to specific firms could lead to accusations of locking others out of the market, a partner at one of the firms told the paper. 

Small and mid-sized firms have reportedly called on bigger firms, as they have had the resources to invest in improving their audits and modernising their technology in response to stricter regulation due to auditing failures and corporate scandals.  

Martin Muirhead, chair of the Association of Practising Accountants, told The Financial Times: “Part of the problem is there isn’t enough knowledge sitting outside of the Big Four. The top firms have learnt a lot over the last five years since Carillion about quality and audit methodology, and educating us would assist us in improving audit quality. 

“Smaller firms do not have the resources to invest in the technology the Big Four use.”

The Big Four told the Financial Times that they were open to talks on helping smaller rivals win highly regulated audits of public interest entities (PIEs), which are large listed companies and privately owned financial groups and insurers. 

Writes Corina Duma in Accountancy Today

FRC outlines three-year plan as costs to rise £6.5m

posted in: News 0

The FRC said it has ‘already taken numerous steps’ towards achieving the goals of the reform program.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has published its latest three-year plan, outlining its priorities and objectives for the period 2023-2026.

The FRC revealed it anticipates an increase of £6.5m in its overall costs for 2023-24, reflecting a delay in the creation of the AuditReporting and Governance Authority (ARGA), and has re-prioritised its work to focus on changes that can be made using its existing powers and remit and where appropriate, planning for the creation of new ARGA powers and functions.

Despite these challenges, the FRC said it has “already taken numerous steps” towards achieving the goals of the reform program. For example, it has released a consultation on a draft Minimum Standard for Audit Committees, as well as publishing guidance on professional judgement for auditors.

The FRC’s Supervision division has also taken responsibility for Public Interest Entity (PIE) auditor registration, which allows the FRC to “act decisively” when it identifies systemic issues in an audit firm.

It also confirmed the enforcement division continues to deliver “proportionate sanctions in a timely manner”, with Constructive Engagement (CE) an increasingly useful approach to many of the cases it investigates.

Sir Jon Thompson, CEO of the FRC, said: “We are actively working towards the goals of the reform program, and though the legislation required to establish ARGA has been delayed, the FRC remained busy throughout 2022 by concentrating on the changes we can bring about through our current powers and remit.

“This plan shows we are committed to fulfilling our mission of serving the public interest and enhancing the quality of corporate governance and reporting.”

Writes Lewis Catchpole in Accountancy Today

Changes abound – adapting to the new audit landscape

posted in: News 0

Against a volatile geopolitical and economic backdrop, 2023 is shaping up to be another critical year for the audit industry. Following three years of pandemic-induced restrictions and disruptions to “traditional” working patterns and practices, a renewed push for audit reform and elevated fraud risk will be key themes for audit professionals over the coming 12 months

Phil Crooks, managing director at Berkeley Research Group, outlines the key changes to the audit landscape in 2023..

Uncertainty remains a key concern

Ongoing economic uncertainty, driven by inflationary pressure and continuing geopolitical conflicts, continues to put pressure on companies’ financial stability. In a recent statement regarding its supervisory focus for the year ahead, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) said: “Given the difficult economic conditions that are currently being experienced, we recognise that many companies, in many different sectors, are currently under particular commercial and financial pressure.”

Significant increases in interest rates and a slowing economy – compounded by the cost-of-living crisis – have led to growing fears that this year will see a wave of corporate failures. Latest figures from the government reveal that there were 1,964 registered company insolvencies in England and Wales in December 2022, some 32% higher than the same month in 2021, and 76% higher than the number registered three years previously.

In turn, the FRC explained that it plans to “be especially careful over the coming year in monitoring where these pressures are being felt most acutely, and tailor [its] selection of company reports for review and audits for inspection accordingly.”  The regulator has already highlighted several sectors it deems to be high risk in the year to come – including the travel, hospitality, leisure, retail, construction and industrial transportation industries.

The ongoing war in Ukraine, meanwhile, remains a major concern and continuing source of political volatility, sanctions and capital market constraints, as well as supply chain issues – all of which could impact revenues, working capital and companies’ access to funding.

Combined, these factors will create additional pressure on already strained management teams looking to meet their debt covenants – a breach of which could trigger material adverse change clauses and result in the loans becoming repayable on demand.

Within this context, auditors should carefully consider companies’ financial stability, whether any loans are set to reach maturity over the next 12 months and whether they need to (re)finance during this period. Crucially, they should also be prepared to see a potential rise in claims as stakeholders look for someone to criticise and blame.

Audit progress despite continued delays

On the regulatory front, preparations for the FRC’s much anticipated transition to the Audit Regulation and Governance Authority (ARGA) will continue into 2023, with the switch now expected to take place in April 2024 – significantly later than originally planned.

The FRC has been criticised in recent years with ARGA hoping to tackle these concerns head on. The transition will provide the regulator with greater enforcement power and a better ability to tackle audit reform and reduce the concentrated power of the Big Four. To meet these new objectives, the organisation is also expected to progressively increase its headcount – with staff levels growing from the current forecasted number of 486 in March 2023, to 533 in March 2024.

In the meantime, the FRC is continuing to push ahead with the changes it can implement with the powers it currently has. Revisions to International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 600[i] introduce a risk-based approach to the audit of groups, with increased focus on identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement.

These changes have been made to ensure the standard remains fit-for-purpose, especially given changing work environments resulting from the pandemic and group auditors’ inability to travel to the component teams. In turn, ISA 600 imposes enhanced responsibilities for direction, supervision and review of the work of component auditors.

Effective for audits for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2023, this marks the third major revision to ISA guidance in three years, following revisions to ISA 315[ii], which deals with identifying risks of material misstatements, in December 2021 and ISA 220[iii], which deals with quality control, in December 2022. The revisions to ISA 315 were implemented to enhance risk assessments and ensure they obtained a detailed understanding of a company’s IT environment and internal controls commensurate to its size and nature. ISA 220 revisions were aimed at strengthening quality management by the whole audit team and emphasising the importance of professional scepticism and auditors’ judgement.

Staying vigilant

Reviewing these auditing standards at regular intervals provides a valuable opportunity for the industry to reflect on past experiences, address situations that were not envisaged when the standards were drafted and adapt guidance for the future.

As work practices evolved to adapt to the pandemic and today’s hybrid working environment, management teams may have taken advantage of this time to override controls, manipulate financial statements, and to conceal or misrepresent information about their financial performance.

Together with an ever-evolving economic and regulatory environment, audit professionals must remain vigilant to the risk of fraudulent financial reporting. Audit firms should be taking a proactive approach in their communication with clients and regulators to spot and address any such inconsistencies or errors in reporting. In what is set to be another challenging year for the industry, auditors must remain on high alert for any threats to the financial reporting ecosystem.

Author

Phil Crooks

Date published March 3, 2023 Accountancy Age

IAASB launches consultation on audits for less complex entities

Following stakeholder feedback on the current consultation, the IAASB envisions approving a final standard in December 2023.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (ISAAB) has launched a consultation regarding a new section of proposed auditing standards for smaller and less complex entities. 

The accountancy body said that smaller, less complex entities “play a vital role in the world’s economy and account for the great majority of entities globally”. 

It added that “in an increasingly complex world with evolving reporting needs, a need for a set of high-quality requirements tailored for the audits of less complex entities has emerged”.

The IAASB previously issued a public consultation for a proposed, stand-alone standard for LCE audits, designed to be proportionate to the typical nature and circumstances of an LCE audit and responsible to stakeholders’ challenges.

However, group audits were not included in the scope of the original exposure draft of the proposed ISA for LCE. 

Following stakeholder feedback, the IAASB reconsidered and developed proposals to address audits of less complex groups. This new Part 10 focusing on LCE group audits was issued for public consultation on 23 January, and feedback is requested by 2 May 2023.

Following stakeholder feedback on the current consultation, the IAASB envisions approving a final standard in December 2023. When final, the standard will meet the growing global need for a separate standard for audits of less complex entities, while reducing the emerging risk of jurisdictional divergence.

Writes Heather Sandlin in Accountancy Today

1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23